UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

I figured someone would make this comparison . Don't get me wrong, the decks are nice, but I truly don't think you should have bad lighting or any confusion on a campaign.

Decknowledgy, that’s exactly what I thought of!

Even if it was bad lighting, and white appears blue...how do you explain the attached pic from the campaign? Both tucks are white, but the pic shows the sides as blue and black. Wouldn't they both be the same color with the same lighting?

The tucks are not the same.

I understand that, but white and off-white are a far-cry from black and blue, as presented in the campaign. I tried taking my decks and changing various lighting sources to reproduce the dark colors shown in the campaign, but couldn't. Again, I like the decks and I'm okay with the tucks, but it's not what was presented.

I get it. I’d be disappointed too if I the decks showed up completely different from what I thought I’d be getting. Maybe I’m in the minority here, but I didn’t see them as blue and black, I saw them as white and gold. I do see a difference in lighting between the campaign picture and the one I posted, but to me they still look like the same tucks. It’s got to be something to do with the science behind the dress picture. My wife sees the dress as blue and black. Myself and my son see it as white and gold.