Paul - it seems that I am the other backer that he refused to refund. As a result, I got the crappy NPCC decks that I will be selling at the first opportunity. The fact that he is refusing to even acknowledge that he is in the wrong here is baffling, even more so than his childish reaction to our comments.vasta41 wrote:Now this makes sense to me. I assumed something was lost in translation and it was. I didn't want to jump to conclusions which is why I asked you to further explain.NemesisFactoryCards wrote:I clarify my situation, i cannot offer refund, i send the decks regulary and then AFTER EVALUATE i refund one people
Your old project is being brought up because potential backers of this current project have the right to know that it's possible that significant details of the project could change after it's over and that you will show no remorse.
I HAVE NEVER ONCE INSULTED YOU despite your best efforts to say that I have. You continue to lump me in with someone else or other people and I would appreciate if you would stop doing that. I refuse to revisit this argument again, I just wanted clarification to your above statement which I received.NemesisFactoryCards wrote: and i refuse to refund the 2 PEOPLE THAT SAY HARD INSULT TO ME!
P.S. You want a MOD to intervene? Well I have by handling the Enuma situation with dignity and professionalism, unlike yourself, and by letting you carry on here again (until I thought you said something inaccurate) without getting involved.
Claude - delivering on your campaign is not an accomplishment that you should be commended on - it is merely your obligation to the backers, nothing more, nothing less. You need to understand that the bait and switch that you pulled is bad form - find some humility and apologise.




