alric wrote:I'm surprised these haven't funded yet. . .What I don't get is why he's not busting his ass on playing card forums promoting his deck? I don't think he's been on any of the main forums, he sure hasn't been here at UC. It seems to me he's not doing all he can to get the word out.
Sparkz wrote:carnival barking for sales may not be Brendan's style, but all on UC are aware of his project as well as members of other forums and pages.
There's a difference between merely being aware of an ongoing project, and getting to know a designer and feeling like he wants to be a part of the community. Just as you are motivated to come here and promote Brendan because you are friends with him and know what a wonderful guy he is, its the same for me. When artists come here to UC and interact with us, give us personal insight into their design process and decision making, answer our questions, and befriend us, I am much more inclined to support him/her and get the word out. It is no coincidence that the two most successful artists in our 2015 Deck of the Year contests (Lorenzo and Giovanni) are two of the most frequently contributing artists here at UC. And what I particularly like about them is that they're not here frequently just exclusively promoting their own decks, but they get involved in discussions about a variety of topics that have nothing to do with their decks as well. They aren't just salesmen with an agenda, they're like one of us.
Brendan is obviously free to promote, or not promote, his product as he sees fit for himself. But there comes a point where if you see your project not funding as robustly as you would like, and the pace of pledging has dwindled and levelled off still just short of your funding goal, it might behoove a designer to make a little effort to get his project as far over the funding hump as possible in whatever short time is left in the project. This is his third project now, and it could seem to some like Brendan thinks its beneath him to "carnival bark" and intermingle with the unruly masses here at UC, like his talent should be sufficient to compel us to disregard his high pricing and we should feel fortunate to be throwing our wallets his way to get one of his fantastic decks. I know, I know, right now you're saying, "Hey, that's not fair, Brendan's nothing like that. He's a talented, humble, and very down-to-earth likeable guy!" And you're probably right, because you know him and are friends with him. But this illustration just proves my point, because
WE don't know him like you do, and he's not a friend of UC, so all we're left with is his conspicuous absence.
I think the general consensus here is that the Dynasty deck is a fine deck of cards, but the pricing has some of us reluctant or on the fence. I agree with alric that it may be beneficial to Brendan to swing by here and other card forums and get a bit more personal and friendly with his potential customer base.